Finally, the post I tried to write on Wednesday morning when Blogger wouldn't let me (post-election blogging overload, one suspects). Much has now been made of the fact that eleven of eleven states passed marriage definition measures:
In a pointed vote against same-sex marriage, voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly supported amendments to their constitutions that would define marriage as between only a man and a woman.
Voters in 10 of the 11 states with such initiatives on their ballots supported the amendments by wide margins.
Gay-rights groups had expected to lose their battle at the ballot box and said the results were not surprising.
"We knew that we were underdogs in every state when we started out," said Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. "Putting a basic right up for a popular vote is always wrong and always extraordinarily difficult to win."
Social conservatives were expectedly pleased, though they were preparing for the possibility that gay-rights groups could pull off a lone victory here in Oregon. "I think it is a real warning shot across the bow of politicians, but also a warning shot across the bow to activist judges," said Gary Bauer, chairman of the Campaign for Working Families, a political action committee that supported the constitutional amendments.
Of course, it passed in Oregon (a solidly Kerry state), too.
One Kerry sympathizer even blamed the Massachusett's Supreme Court for Bush winning:
Since George Bush ended up winning, the "most important event" title ought to be something that helped him, not something that helped John Kerry.
With that in mind, I'll plump for the Massachusett's Supreme Court's decision to legalize gay marriage. The result was nearly a dozen initiatives across the country to ban gay marriage and a perfect wedge issue for Republicans. (Link via Instapundit)
Amusing, but likely some truth to it.
The polls show that Bush rode the 'moral issues' issue to victory:
Moral values topped the list of issues voters were most concerned about when they went to the polls on Election Day, with Catholics, evangelicals, blacks and Hispanics joining an ad hoc coalition that re-elected President Bush by 3.5 million votes.
A national exit poll of 13,531 voters found 22 percent cited moral values as the "most important issue," with the economy and jobs second at 20 percent and terrorism at 19 percent, according to a joint survey by Edison Media Research and Mitofsky International. Iraq came in fourth at 15 percent.
This, of course, is a rude awakening for the elites on the two coasts. But for Red State America it's a very real concern. People are tired of the amorality of the dominant culture being shoved down their throat and being told they're racist, homophobic, etc. [insert condescending insult here] unless they like it.
Now, will all of those evangelicals and religiously minded Bush voters be rewarded for their loyalty? I keep being told that a Republican had to be elected so we can overturn Roe v. Wade. Well, it's been 32 years and counting and after five Republican Presidents since the ruling it still stands. How many current Justices were appointed by Republicans? How many GOP appointed Justices sat on the court in 1972? You do the math.
After that reality sets in, lets see which happens first: Roe v. Wade is overturned, or the Supreme Court finds a Constitutionally protected right for homosexual marriage and all those state initiatives passed on Tuesday suddenly become little more than wasted ink. I know which one I'd be more likely to pick.*
*Note that GOP Senator Arlen Specter already is warning Bush not to send nominees to the Senate who might overturn Roe v. Wade.
1 comment:
I live in Oregon and while many who beleive that allowing the teminally ill to kill themselves is a family value, we've not gone completely over the edge. Yet.
There was a lot of opposition to the measure, and don't believe the spokesmen who say they didn't expect it to pass here. They did and are very peeved it didn't.
57% of Oregonians decided to define marriage as between one man and one woman. Only because there were some who weren't clear on that point.
I wanted to give you a link to a group supporting the measure, but Google shows nothing but pro articles, message boards and blogs. I know they refuse ads to sites which, in their opinion, are hostile to homosexuality. The apologetics ministry, Stand to Reason has been refused ads space.
I'm wondering after going through pages and pages of pro site links whether they do the same to search results.
Post a Comment